MODERN MOBILE INTERNET DEVICES IN EDUCATION, HYGIENIC ASPECTS

I. Sh. Mukhametzyanov,
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Institute of Education Management of the Russian Academy of Education 5/16, 1B Makarenko st., Moscow, 105062, Russian Federation
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5008-0721
Scopus ID: 57190295879 TR ID: А-9424-2017
РИНЦ SPIN-код: 7717-2447, AuthorID: 612847

MODERN MOBILE INTERNET DEVICES IN EDUCATION, HYGIENIC ASPECTS

Introduction. The article discusses the features of the existing practice of rationing in our country and abroad, and hygienic assessment of mobile learning tools based on information and communication technologies. In our work we present an overview of the current state of Informatization of education in Russia and in the world through the prism of the use of smartphones and mobile Internet and consider the possible impact of this process on the health of students.

Methodology. Information and communication technologies used in education, mobile technical means and their possible negative effect on the health of the user, the conditions of their safe use are analyzed.

Results. The article analyzes the existing practice of using modern technical means of informatization of education and electronic educational resources. The results of the study can serve as the basis for the develop- ment of a program of safe communication in the learning process and the formation of skills for the safe use of modern educational technologies in terms of physical, mental and social well-being of students.

Conclusions. The active use of modern technologies for accessing educational resources within the framework of “digital” training will be inevitably realized with the use of mobile means of access, and, first of all, smartphones. This will inevitably lead the learning process beyond the traditional educational organi- zation and the existing safety standards for the use of modern technologies existing for traditional educa- tional organizations. Taking into account the fact that the smartphone is also a tool for identification and socialization of the learner, the negative influences on his mental and physical health caused by the learner’s dependence should be taken into account in the development of “digital” training programs.

Keywords: mobile learning, movable PCs, health-saving information and educational environment.

References

  1. Shihnabieva T. S. Adaptive semantic model of automated knowledge control. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 2016. No. 7. рр. 14–20.
  2. Koroleva D. Always Online: Mobile Technology and Social Media Usage by Modern Teenagers at Home and at School. Voprosy obrazovaniya. No 1(eng).2016. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/always-online-mobile- technology-and-social-media-usage-by-modern-teenagers-at-home-and-at-school#ixzz4dvKLyRRL.
  3. Maslinsky K. A., Ivaniushina V. A. To be a teacher? Factors influencing attitudes towards leaving the teaching profession. Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2016. No. 4. рр. 8–26.
  4. Soldatova G., Zotova, E., Lebedeva M., Shlyapnikov V. Internet: vozmozhnosti, kompetencii, bezopasnost’. Metodicheskoe posobie dlya 153 rabotnikov sistemy obshchego obrazovaniya [The Internet: opportunities, competen- cies, safety. Methodical manual for 153 employees of the General education system]. Moscow: Google, 2013. 165 p. URL: http://www.ifap.ru/library/book548.pdf (accessed: 28.03.2018).
  5. Yakunina A. F. Information and communication technologies and digital literacy of the teacher. Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta imeni A. P. Chekhova. 2016. No. 1. URL:http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/informatsionno- kommunikatsionnye-tehnologii-i-tsifrovaya-gramotnost-pedagoga (accessed: 28.03.2018).
  6. Petrenko A. O. Gigienicheskaya ocenka udobochitaemosti tekstov, pred`yavlyaemyh na ehkranah riderov : avtoref. dis. … kand. med. Nauk [Hygienic assessment of readability of texts presented on the screens of readers. ab- stract of dissertation Candidate of Medical Sciences]. Moscow. 2016. p. 24. URL: http://vak.ed.gov.ru/az/server/php/ filer.php?table=att_case&fld=autoref&key[]=211479/
  7. Hennessy M. A., Using Smartphones (and other PDAs) in Class: These Days, it’s Cool! URL: http://lessonplanspage.com/using-smartphones-and-other-pdas-in-class-these-days-its-cool/
  8. Pearson Student Mobile Device Survey 2015. National Report: College Students. URL: http://www.pearsoned.com/wp-content/uploads/2015-Pearson-Student-Mobile-Device-Survey-College.pdf
  9. Farley H., Murphy A., Johnson C., Carter B., Lane M., Midgley W., Hafeez-Baig A., Dekeyser S., Koronios A. How Do Students Use Their Mobile Devices to Support Learning? A Case Study from an Australian Re- gional University. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2015(1), p. Art. 14. URL: http://doi.org/10.5334/jime.ar
  10. 34 Smart ideas for using smartphones in the classroom. URL: http://www.teachthought.com/pedagogy/instructional- strategies/36-smart-ideas-for-using-smartphones-in-the-classroom/
  11. Sarwar M., SoomroT. R. Impact of Smartphone’s on Society. European Journal of Scientific Research. ISSN 1450-216X/1450-202X. Vol. 98 No. 2 March, 2013, pp. 216–226. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publica- tion/236669025_Impact_of_Smartphone%27s_on_Society
  12. Mukhametzyanov I. Sh. Medical and psychological requirements to the conditions of functioning of infor- mation and educational space. Kazanskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal. 2013. No. 1 (96). pp. 27–40.
  13. Kuchma V. R., Stepanova M. I., Sazanyuk Z. I., Alexandrova I. E., Polenova M. A., Lashneva I. P., Berezi- na N. Oh. Gigienicheskaya ocenka zanyatij doshkol’nikov s ispol’zovaniem ehlektronnyh planshetov. Gigiena i sanitariya [Hygienic assessment of preschool classes using electronic tablets. Hygiene and sanitation]. Vol. 95. No. 4. 2016. pp. 387–391. URL: http://www.medlit.ru/journalsview/gigsan/view/journal/2016/issue-2/1137-gigienicheskaya- ocenka-rezhima-dnya-i-umstvennoy-rabotosposobnosti-detey-poseschayuschih-organizacii-dopolnitel-nogo- obrazovaniya/
  14. Chen B., Seilhamer R., Bennett L., Baue S. Students’ Mobile Learning Practices in Higher Education: A Multi-Year Study. URL: http://er.educause.edu/articles/2015/6/students-mobile-learning-practices-in-higher-education-a-multiyear-study
  15. Darrel A. Regier1, Emily A. Kuhl1, David J. Kupfer2. DSM-5: Classification and changes in criteria. Vsemirnaya psihiatriya. 2013. No. 2. pp. 88–94. URL: http://www.wpanet.org/uploads/Publications/ WPA_Journals/World_Psychiatry/Past_Issues/Russian/WPA13-12-2_Low.pdf.
  16. Matar Boumosleh J., Jaalouk D. (2017) Depression, anxiety, and smartphone addiction in university stu- dents- A cross sectional study. PLoS ONE. 12 (8): e0182239. 2017. No. 4. URL: http://sci-hub.tw/ https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182239
  17. Horwood S. & Anglim J. Personality and problematic smartphone use: A facet-level analysis using the Five Factor Model and HEXACO frameworks. Computers in Human. Behavior (2018), DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.013.
  18. Kim H. Exercise rehabilitation for smartphone addiction. J. Exerc.Rehabil. 2013 Dec; 9(6): 500–505. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3884868/
  19. Internet Addiction Around the World. URL: http://www.adweek.com/digital/internet-addiction-around-world/
  20. Malygin V. L., Merkuriev Y. A., Krasnov I. O. Neuropsychological features as risk factors for the devel- opment of Internet-dependent behavior of adolescents. Medicinskaya psihologiya v Rossii. 2015. No. 4 (33). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/neyropsihologicheskie-osobennosti-kak-faktory-riska-formirovaniya-internet- zavisimogo-povedeniya-u-podrostkov.
  21. Škařupová K., Ólafsson K., Blinka L. (2015) The effect of smartphone use on trends in European adoles- cents’ excessive Internet use, Behaviour & Information Technology, 35:1, 68–74, DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2015.1114144.
  22. Savci M., Aysan F. Technological addictions and social connectedness: predictor effect of internet addic- tion, social media addiction, digital game addiction and smartphone addiction on social connectedness. Dusunen Ad- am The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences 2017; No. 30 pp. 202–216. URL: https://doi.org/10.5350/DAJPN2017300304.
  23. Lachmann B., Sariyska R., Kannen C., Stavrou M., Montag C. Commuting, Life-Satisfaction and Internet Addiction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(10): 1176. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14101176.
  24. Herrero J., Urueña A., Torres A., Hidalgo A. Socially Connected but Still Isolated: Smartphone Addiction Decreases Social Support Over Time. Social Science Computer Review. December 4, 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0894439317742611.
  25. Duke É., Montag C. Smartphone addiction, daily interruptions and self-reported productivity. Addictive Behaviors Reports. 2017;6:90-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2017.07.002.
  26. Min Kwon, Dai-Jin Kim, Hyun Cho, Soo Yang The Smartphone Addiction Scale: Development and Validation of a Short Version for Adolescents. Published: December 31, 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.13871/journal.pone.008355
  27. Aeyoung Roh, Soo-young Bhang, Jung-Seok Choi, Yong Sil Kweon, Sang-Kyu Lee, Marc N. Potenza The validation of Implicit Association Test measures for smartphone and Internet addiction in at-risk children and adoles- cents. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. Vol. 7, Issue 1. URL: https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.02
  28. Asli Enez Darcin, Samet Kose, Cemal Onur Noyan, Serdar Nurmedov, Onat Yılmaz & Nesrin Dilbaz (2016). Smartphone addiction and its relationship with social anxiety and loneliness, Behaviour & Information Tech- nology, 35:7, 520-525, DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1158319.
  29. Nazir S. Hawi & Maya Samaha (2017). Relationships among smartphone addiction, anxiety, and family re- lations, Behaviour & Information Technology, 36:10, pp. 1046–1052, DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2017.1336254.